首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating user response to in-car haptic feedback touchscreens using the Lane Change Test
【2h】

Evaluating user response to in-car haptic feedback touchscreens using the Lane Change Test

机译:使用车道变更测试评估用户对车载触觉反馈触摸屏的响应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Touchscreen interfaces are widely used in modern technology, from mobile devices to in-car infotainment systems. However, touchscreens impose significant visual workload demands on the user which have safety implications for use in cars. Previous studies indicate that the application of haptic feedback can improve both performance of and affective response to user interfaces. This paper reports on and extends the findings of a 2009 study conducted to evaluate the effect of different combinations of touchscreen visual, audible and haptic feedback on driving and task performance, affective response and subjective workload, the initial findings of which were originally published in [8]. A total of 48 non-expert users completed the study. A dual-task approach was applied, using the Lane Change Test as the driving task and realistic automotive use case touchscreen tasks. Results indicated that while feedback type had no effect on driving or task performance, preference was expressed for multimodal feedback over visual alone. Issues with workload and cross-modal interaction were also identified.
机译:触摸屏界面已广泛用于现代技术,从移动设备到车载信息娱乐系统。然而,触摸屏对用户施加了显着的视觉工作量要求,这对于在汽车中使用具有安全隐患。先前的研究表明,触觉反馈的应用可以改善用户界面的性能和情感响应。本文报告并扩展了2009年进行的一项研究的结果,该研究旨在评估触摸屏视觉,听觉和触觉反馈的不同组合对驾驶和任务绩效,情感反应和主观工作量的影响,其最初发现最初发表于[ 8]。共有48位非专家用户完成了这项研究。应用了双重任务方法,将车道变更测试用作驾驶任务并实现了实际的汽车用例触摸屏任务。结果表明,尽管反馈类型对驾驶或任务绩效没有影响,但表达了相对于单纯视觉的多模式反馈偏好。还确定了工作量和跨模式交互的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号